Think...
You can not do today's job
with yesterday's ideas and
be in business
TOMORROW
This image is from the side of an abandoned
building where an American company failed to pay
attention to its own sign.
That sign could be hanging on the side of the
Conservative America building soon.
For more than 50 years, a Marxist cancer has
been aggressively metastasizing in the
American body politic. Marxism is feudalism with a
new name. The Marxist goal is to reduce Americans
to the status of serfs. Unbeknownst to
conservatives until it was too late, the Marxist
Left infiltrated and took over large trusts and
foundations so they could gain access to the huge
amounts of money that they needed to accomplish
their goals. Through a deviously masterful and
long-term program of propaganda and infiltration
they have risen to dominate/control film,
commercial television, public radio, public
television, newspapers/magazines, the Internet, and
primary and secondary education. Like the sappers
and miners of old, they have been using these
organs of public influence to deliberately
undermine, destabilize, and ultimately destroy the
culture and institutions that hold this country
together. Family, faith, education, government, the
list goes on. So far, they have been largely
successful.
Whatever you choose to call them, the Marxist
Left, "Progressives", communists, socialists, etc.
have brought this country to where it is today with
the skillful use of one weapon of war:
propaganda. You may or may not be able to
describe each and every technique in detail but you
know it when you see or hear it, it isn't hard to
find, and it's really irritating.
Unfortunately, it's also really effective.
The Left uses propaganda because it works. This is
a fact, not an opinion. That conservatives have
utterly and miserably FAILED to counter that
propaganda is also a fact. If conservatives do not
acknowledge that failure and act instead of whine,
they will be continuing to do today's job with
yesterday's ideas, and they will NOT be in business
tomorrow.
The Unpleasant Realities And What To Do About
It
The first step in solving a problem is
admitting you have a problem. We are going to
cover what they are and then propose potential
solutions. If you agree, we want your comments, and
maybe later, your help. On the other hand, if
we don't hear from anybody, or conservative
Americans think our partial solution is a stupid
idea, or nobody cares, we'll sit back and watch the
trainwreck from the stands but nobody is going
to be able to say we didn't try.
Ok, here's what you will find here:
-
THE battlespace for the future of
America is the major media. It defines
politics and culture. Regardless of what
happens in this or that election, the Right
will continue to lose unless it wakes up
from its state of denial and acts - NOW
-
The conservative/Republican Right has
been a complete, miserable, and utter
FAILURE when it comes to this
battlespace.
-
The conservative/Republican alleged
leadership is largely willfully ignorant,
in denial, or would rather whine about
these problems than do anything.
-
The Marxist Left is overwhelming us and
winning on 7/8 public influence fronts. You
probably have no idea idea how bad it is.
We'll show you.
-
The Internet alone is NOT going
to solve our problem and relying on the
Internet as a primary source
of influence is doomed to FAIL.
-
The first step in solving this abject
FAILURE on our part runs counter to
conservative instincts and we’re
going to ask you to comment on it and/or
help us with it
-
We CAN reclaim America. It won't happen
overnight, but if we don't start now, when
will we start?
WARNING: This piece isn’t written
in obsequious, grant- application-Weaselese.
We’ve tried that and it went in one ear and
out the other for over a year - that is, assuming
we could get anybody to read it in the first place.
This is written in simple English and is addressed
to the American People, not the Gucci-
ballerina-shoe-wearing professional politicos who
got us in this position in the first place.
Furthermore, these issues require an attention
span, something that seems to be in short supply in
America these days. If you want a 10 second answer
to a 50 year problem, cut us a check for $20m and
we'll take care of it for ya :) We’re not
going to pull any punches because the time for
being polite and politically correct is over. If
you’re more concerned with style over
substance or, if you can’t handle
constructive criticism or, if you want to keep
doing the same thing over and over again expecting
different results, you might as well
click-out
now.
And just in case we haven't made it clear
already, we're not here to crap all over our own
team and then walk away. We're here to identify
the problems we have and then at least, try to
fix them.
There is a Marxist pResident in the White House
along with a pack of gangsters in Congress who are
flushing this country right down the toilet faster
than anyone ever imagined so we’re not
interested in stroking egos, WE’RE
INTERESTED IN RESULTS.
LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET OUT OF THE
WAY
Commercial Broadcast Media
"The war's over. It's over, I saw it on
television!"
Since the media is the battlespace, we
need to examine what it is, what it does, and what
its limitations are. The largest component of the
media is commercial broadcast so we're going to
look at that first.
The first step in solving a problem is
admitting you have a problem. What is our
biggest problem?
-
The Right doesn’t know how to
communicate and influence the public
anymore and
-
we surrendered the means of
distributing our message.
We were so busy minding our own business,
raising families, making an honest living, and
leading productive, moral lives that we forgot that
there are immoral parasites among us who want to
enslave us. To do that they use the mass media and
we let them have at it.
The question has been asked who was the most
influential person in the 20th century
and usually the answer is Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc.
We believe the answer is Josef Goebbels. His
development of the Big Lie technique of mass
influence, among others, is one of the primary
reasons we are where we are. Hitler understood that
you get more mileage with hate than anything else.
Combine that with ubiquitous, audacious Big Lies,
and you get the NYT, MSDNC, etc.
If you haven't seen Wag
The Dog, go rent it. Pay particular
attention to the emotional manipulation achieved
by the music in the scene with Willie Nelson
leading the jingle singers. Never
underestimate the power of commercial broadcast
media to set the perception of reality. If
the public is constantly exposed to
television/radio panel discussions involving how
far or fast pigs should be allowed to fly,
sooner or later a good number of them will start
believing that pigs actually do fly. The faulty
premise that pigs can fly is assumed and the
discussion follows from there. This is a
favorite technique of the Left. "Since the
entire world agrees that we're all going to die
of global warming in 5 years, how much
additional tax money should we spend on this
crisis?" TV and radio is rife with this.
goo goo gaa gaa
social justice!
Right-leaning talk radio is successful because
it appeals to people who like to think. Leftwing
media appeals to people who don’t want to
have to think. They want the problem
they’ve been told they have wrapped up in a
snappy catchphrase so they can avoid
thinking. Example: The reason Lefties are so
quick to jump on the gun-control bandwagon is that
contemplating the prospect of defending themselves
is just so unpleasant that they wish their problem
away when some puppetmaster gives them a slogan.
It's not logical but it works.
Ever notice that the Left always uses simple,
catchy phrases based on emotion to sell their
swill? "Saturday Night Special", "Cop-killer
bullets", "Bush lied, people died", "No blood for
oil" etc. The Left caters to the bumpersticker,
adolescent mentality. The Nazis had the
Reichministerium für Volksaufklärung und
Propaganda - or RMVP, under Dr Joseph
Goebbels.
(info).
The Left's "Ministry for Popular
Enlightenment and Propaganda" includes
everything but talk radio.
Let's put who owns the media and how little the
Right gets to use it aside for a minute. There are
major differences in the way the Left and Right use
the media. The Left understands they’re in a
streetfight but instead of a broken bottle, their
weapon is the mass media. The Right on the other
hand, acts like they’re engaged in a friendly
debate in Moot Court under Roberts Rules of
Order.
The only thing that matters in a
streetfight is who is still standing at the
end. The stakes being what they are, losing
like a gentleman to a dishonorable opponent is
stupid. For example, in a debate on gun control,
the pro-gun side holds up a chart of statistics,
Sarah Brady holds up pictures of dead babies.
Statistics vs. Dead Babies. Dead babies wins
every time. The Left just bashed the Right over
the head with a garbage can and the Right asks for
a point of order. This crap has got to
stop.
Imagine this instead. A video starts with
a smartly dressed young woman walking down the
street at night. Suddenly she’s grabbed from
behind - with one hand over her mouth, a look of
panic and terror in her eyes, she’s dragged
backwards into a dark alley. Camera goes black as
they disappear into the darkness. Next scene,
Dirtbag is coming out of the alley tucking his
shirt in, looks both ways, and the crane-shot over
his shoulder zooms down the alley to a pair of
woman’s legs sticking out from behind a
dumpster and the sound of a woman softly crying is
heard. TAPE REWINDS. Woman is being dragged
back into the alley, camera catches the flash of
three shots. Woman appears from the darkness, puts
her gun into her purse, gets out her cellphone,
starts speaking to a 911 operator. Crane-shot down
alley to Dirtbag’s legs sticking out
from behind the dumpster. Black screen,
side-by-side images of the woman's legs and the
Dirtbag's legs. White text underneath that says
One scenario, two different
outcomes.
Which one do you want for your
wife or daughter?
This dose of reality brought to
you by:
Someone With A Clue How Make A
Point
You know what would happen if it actually
got made and actually got any exposure. The Left
would go berserk. Just imagine the look
on Chuckie Schumer's face. They’d trot
out the usual cries of "This inflammatory
propaganda is inciting vigilante justice!" and "We
don’t think it's appropriate for people to
take the law into their own hands!" They’d
whine around the clock for a week.
Who cares? Smile! It wouldn’t matter
what they said or how long they whined. The image
of that woman’s legs sticking out from behind
the dumpster would be permanent. Anything
the Left said after the fact wouldn’t stand a
chance next to that image. A devastating
first-strike the Left could not recover from. THAT
is streetfight communications.
If the Right knew how to communicate, had the
cahones to do it, and were more interested in
winning than donations from geldings, they’d
be scaring the crap out of women.
Isn’t that what the Left is doing with their
pictures of dead babies? "Well, we don't want to
stoop to their level!" Would you prefer to be dead?
Besides, it's not a matter of stooping anywhere.
It's one thing to knowingly lie like the Left does
using emotional images representing statistics they
fabricated from from whole cloth. The stats they
cite for accidental deaths of children are
fraudulent (like including every dead gang-banging
drug dealer under the age of 25 in their class of
dead babies); it's entirely another thing when the
stats the Right can cite for assaults on women are
true. So who exactly is doing the stooping and why
hasn’t that video and others like it been
produced? Unfortunately, even if we recruited the
money and talent to produce that video, where would
it get shown when the Right doesn’t have
any distribution?
By the way, as this is being written there are
some very effective commercials airing on TV
exposing the fraud of government managed healthcare
"reform." Why are we always spending a fortune on
TV commercials, at the last minute, when we're
backed up against the wall by the Left with one of
their manufactured crises? If we had any
long-term, persistent media exposure that
could have pounded the issue home, this crap might
never have come up in the first place!
While we’re on the subject of how the
Right doesn’t know how to communicate,
let’s talk about how...
When it comes to the media, the Left always
attacks from the extreme left, the Right always
defends from the center.
Any good wheeler-dealer will tell you that when
you're negotiating over something, you don’t
start by asking for what you think you will get in
the end, you start by asking for every last
thing you want and a whole lot more. Business
101. The Left relentlessly produces and distributes
their propaganda product everywhere they can and as
often as they can. Stupid 9/11
conspiracy theory "crockumentaries" produced by
brainwashed teenagers in their parent’s
basements, enviro-whacko global warming theories
promoting UN control of everything. Promotion of
the radical homosexual agenda to de-stabilize the
family and the military. There are absolutely no
outrageous positions the Left won’t put forth
with a straight face. The more outrageous the
better and the more often the better.
When the Right is called on to respond to some
Socialist outrage du jour, they always want to
appear "reasonable" and "measured" and because of
that, they fail miserably. They fail
miserably because a) they’re responding to
something that never should have come up in the
first place had they had an effective offense,
i.e., they are constantly caught off- guard, and b)
they are not naturally streetfighters.
The get suckered into arguing with the children
on the child's terms instead of telling them to
shut the hell up, the adults are in charge. And why
do they do this? First, because they're
incompetent, and second, they do it because if they
do actually manage to muster the testosterone to
call it the way it is once in a while, they get
hammered non-stop in the Lefty media and have no
place for cover or to conduct their own
attack.
Commercial broadcasting is inherently
compromised. Don't let anyone kid you, commercial
broadcasting is about entertainment first. Don't
get us wrong. There's nothing wrong with
entertainment per se. Look at what
Glenn
Beck does on FNC. He does a great
job of jamming more important information
into one hour than practically anybody else and
he does it entertainingly. He went from zero to
a rockin' 2 million+ a day audience in no-time -
in a really crappy time slot no less. With that
said...
The Right, to the extent they get any airtime,
relies on commercial programming which by its very
nature must be weighted towards entertainment and
frequent commercial breaks in order to make a
profit. In television for example, anything really
important gets 6 minutes sandwiched in between the
latest lesbian-midget murder trial, Paris Hilton,
Al Sharpton, and twenty minutes of commercials.
And what about the 3 day Freak-A-Thons?
The world is going to hell in a NY minute, Congress
is jamming the most destructive legislation down
America's throat at a rate and scope unprecedented
in the history of the nation and and we get
three 24/7 days of maudlin crap over a freak
entertainer? If that doesn't tell you where
commercial broadcasting's priorities are, we don't
know what will. And if you thought the latest
Freak-A-Thon was bad, just wait till The Swimmer
keels over.
If you're a commercial talk radio listener and
bothered to clock a popular, 3 hour per day show,
you'd find that almost 50% of it is news, sports,
weather, traffic, and commercials. So 90 minutes
out of 3 hours is actual "content." What that means
is that serious, in-depth discussions are
often hampered by frequent interruptions. Many, not
all, of these shows involve opinion reinforcement
rather than presentation of new information. This
is not always the case but it is the nature of the
beast.
The Effect of Advertising In Commercial
Media
The lizard and J.P. Morgan
Advertising is what makes the commercial
broadcasting world go 'round. As annoying as it can
be, no advertising = no programming.
Advertising is a good thing. On the
other hand....Despite what the little green lizard
would have you believe, the insurance and banking
industries are not your friends. They're
businesses and their business is to get as much of
your money as they can get away with. There is
absolutely nothing wrong with that so long as your
interaction with them is voluntary. However, these
industries are certainly not above using their
friends in government to compel you to pay
them - or else. Any industry that compels you to
pay them, or has their friends in government compel
you to pay them - or else - is in the same business
that Tony Soprano is in whether or not it has the
veneer of legality.
Now, if the little green lizard or the mega bank
is pumping millions of dollars of advertising money
into our pockets, or our affiliate's pockets, do
you think we're likely to say anything too critical
of them? Wall Street (Goldman Sachs) is running
this country now, just rolled Congress like a drunk
in the park, the insurance industry stands to make
a fortune off operating forced, government dictated
healthcare (just like they do with compelled car
insurance), and who in commercial broadcasting,
except maybe Glenn Beck, is going to stick his
financial neck out to point this out?
Again, don't get us wrong. As far
as commercial television is concerned, the problem
isn't that there's something wrong with the few
conservative-leaning shows out there,
the problem is that there
aren't enough of them.
As far as commercial
conservative-leaning talk-radio is concerned,
there's plenty of that except that 50% of it is
eaten up by things other than the program
itself.
Remember, get out of the weeds and think
BIG-PICTURE. It's not just the nooz media, it's any
programming where politics can be injected or where
societal norms can be trashed. It's not just
FNC vs MSDNC or CNN. You can't say we've got Rush
or Beck and the competition stinks and
conservatives don't watch that stuff anyway. The
ratings for MSDNC or CNN stink but they're just a
couple of slices out of the big Marxist pie. Look
at the total number of hours of all types of
programming, and what types of programming can have
politics creep in. The Left doesn't just have MSDNC
and CNN, they have ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, NPR, the
BBC, and a whole bunch of non-nooz cable channels
that day after day, hour after hour, dribble out a
Lefty message. How many times have you seen a cop,
doctor, lawyer, reality, or some other drama or
entertainment show where Lefty politics is
presented as the norm or is assumed? Have you ever
[gasp] seen what they do on "
Taxicab Confessions"? It's a freakshow that had
to be dreamt up by a coke-addled hollyweird with
voyeur issues. We'll spare you the details. What
about music programming? CMT versus all of the
softcore musical porn addressed to 12 year olds and
those no-talent, worse-than-useless-rappers pimped
out by liberal white music execs who are ruining
the chances for an entire generation of young
blacks. You can't watch the danged weather channel
without getting a dose of it. Just because you
don't watch a lot of decadent TV doesn't mean the
rest of the country is like you.
Commercial Media Bias And The Whining About
It
THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF UNBIASED NEWS MEDIA IS A
LIBERAL CONSTRUCT DESIGNED TO NEUTER THEIR
OPPOSITION
The bad joke is that we fell for it and we
continue to fall for it. In the days before
film and television, everybody knew there was bias
in the newspapers, there were lots of them, and
people just bought the paper they liked. When
newsreels arrived, was there any pretense about
objectivity? Somewhere along the way somebody
decided there should be some standards and
"journalism" schools started showing up. In the old
days, newsmen were called newsmen. What is news
anyway? In theory, "news" involves facts, not
conclusions. Example:
Newsman: "Mainstreet Trainwreck Causes
Property Damage"
Journalist: "Bush Tax Cuts Cause
Trainwreck"
Conclusions are a matter of opinion. When you're
a "Journalist" it's easy to forget that news
involves facts, not conclusions.
Conservatives and Republicans like private
enterprise don't they? And isn't MSDNC a commercial
enterprise? Do you like the idea of somebody trying
to tell you how to run YOUR business? Just because
MSDNC happens to be owned and operated by a bunch
of hypocritical Marxists, they can operate their
business any way they like, can't they? Just
because you bought into their song and dance that
they're supposed to be unbiased doesn't mean they
give a fat rat's butt - or that they have to.
They're going to do exactly as they like and
there's nothing you can do about it except change
the channel - OR START YOUR OWN NETWORK.
The problem with changing the channel is that
90% of the other channels are also owned and
operated by lying Marxists. If conservatives
started their own additional news network and had
someplace to run it, they could adhere to the
standards that almost nobody except Fox adheres to
(sans Sharpton) and be successful because
they actually have a legitimate argument. They
might actually convince some "normal" Democrats if
they could get them exposed to it. Yeah it would be
nice if "news" was straight down the middle and
"you decide" but is that what 90% of the news media
is doing? Even FNC screws up from time to time.
Conservatives have what amounts to a prisoner
mentality. Ever see the old WWII footage of the
Japanese soldier throwing potatoes off the back of
a truck into a sea of waving arms of their POW's?
That's US. The Marxist Left throws us a potato once
in a while and we scramble after it. And then we
whine that we're not getting enough potatoes in
their prison camp. When are conservatives going
to break out of THEIR prison camp and START OUR OWN
NETWORK?
What we're talking about here
isn't "media bias", it's a propaganda war. Marxists
are waging it, and America is the
target.
Recently there was a “
Conservative Leadership Summit to Confront Media
Bias” and perhaps it was just an
oversight that nobody called us for our
opinion.
Don Irvine said:
“Instead of doing the same
things we’ve been doing for years, we hope to
strike off in new directions, develop new
techniques and try new approaches — and do so
as a coalition, rather than separate organizations,
with each focusing on its own concerns.”
When you are the subject of a propaganda war,
there are only two choices:
1) Silence the opposition or,
2) Out-produce the opposition
So exactly what "new techniques" and "new
approaches" are they going to try that is going to
out-produce ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSDNC, PBS, NPR,
and the BBC?
Are they going to put up yet another useless
website that nobody knows is there in an
attempt to out-produce an enemy with a daily
aggregate audience of 20 million plus?
Gee, one of the suggestions in that article was
a "A Drudge- Style Report On Media Bias"...
Do we really need to have Captain
Obvious report for duty here?
Why do we get the feeling that when they "strike
off in new directions" that means changing the
direction of the circle they're going in within the
same prison camp?
We are NOT questioning the integrity or
sincerity of the participants of that conference,
we're concerned that they're not addressing the
real problem,
which is the fact that THE
RIGHT HAS NO DISTRIBUTION FOR ITS MESSAGE.
"What do you mean we have no distribution for
our message, we have...." Sit tight, we'll
get to that.
Non-Commercial Broadcast Media
Bear with us here for a minute, this is
important. When most people think of
non-commercial, or "public" broadcasting they think
of PBS. The Public Broadcasting System was set up
by Congress in around 1967 and has a TV side and a
radio side. Contrary to what most people think, it
isn't some monolith where all of the programming
originates and is controlled from one giant
source.
Each public broadcasting station is a
member-station of the PBS system but each station
is free create, "upload", and "download" whatever
programming they like as long as it's
non-commercial. In otherwords, let's say your local
college station has its own public radio and TV
station. Those stations can create their own
programming and make that programming available to
other public broadcasting stations by way of a
master distribution system maintained in
Washington, D.C.
Your local station can also receive by satellite
whatever programming they want to air that
originated elsewhere, like a documentary that was
produced by WGBH-TV in Boston, or NPR programming.
NPR is a "content producer" just like any
independent production house. They make their
programming available to "subscriber" stations for
a fee. There are other independent operators that
produce a lot of the programming that PBS stations
carry. On radio, Minnesota Public Radio is one of
them.
What most people don't realize is that ANY
non-commercial entity can produce non-commercial
programming and make it available to ANY public
broadcasting station that wants to take it. You
don't have to kiss some liberal's butt at PBS/NPR
in order to make your programming available to
EVERY public broadcasting station using the same
satellite distribution technology that PBS/NPR
uses. However, just because somebody puts some
programming up on the PBS satellite system doesn't
mean any particular station has to carry
it.
Ok, now that we've got all of that boring
stuff out of the way, we're going to talk about the
way the Left uses public broadcasting and the
hierarchy of their propaganda distribution.
As bad as the propaganda in
commercial broadcasting is, public broadcasting is
MUCH WORSE AND MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE. We know
it's hard for conservatives to believe that public
broadcasting propaganda would be more effective
than commercial broadcasting but it's true.
Whatever you can say about the people running the
Marxist Left, they are not stupid and they're
winning. The amount of money they spend on
non-commercial broadcasting is staggering
and they wouldn't be doing it if it wasn't working
for them. We'll show you how much shortly.
Marxist Target #1, Useful
Idiots: The "Liberal Intelligentsia"
Yuri Bezmenov, KGB defector discusses
how to destroy a country
One thing the Left has always understood (and
the Right still hasn't figured out) is that if you
want to propagandize a population, you have to
target the "intelligentsia" first. (See sidebar
PermaSmile of Evil)
You've heard the expression "S___ flows
downhill"? Well, that's the way it works with
propaganda. Marxists target and create the liberal
intelligentsia first.
Do yourself and your friends a favor some time
and watch a KGB defector talk about what they do
here:
He discusses how demoralizing and destroying a
country is done, how the US is Target #1, and who
they use first.
You MUST watch these videos from beginning to
end.
There's a pecking order to propaganda
distribution and it flows from top to bottom like
this:
Hardcore Marxist sources like
Pacifica/DemocracyNow
Academia - PBS Radio & TV -
Newspapers/Magazines
Cable TV
Network TV
Do not make the mistake of discounting the
importance of non- commercial, Marxist propaganda
distribution. Marxists would always prefer to
use somebody else's money to get what they want
before they'll use their own. Whenever they decide
they need to fabricate a crisis so they can
tax/extort/control some measure of your life, they
get some of their hacks in academia to do a study
or write a propaganda book on the crisis du jour.
Those hacks introduce the "story" into the KGB
Broadcasting Network which serves as a cue for more
"mainstream" outfits like PBS/NPR/NYT to run with
it. Finally after it's had a little while to
percolate, the commercial broadcast networks go
with it and voila! It's reality. "...I saw it on
television!"
Here's a perfect example. The Marxists
hate the military. Any way they can find
to trash the military they will. Have you heard
people in the "mainstream" media repeat the
statement that "America has 737 military bases
around the world" as if there are
goose-stepping American colonialist stormtroopers
oppressing people all over the globe? It's a lie.
When you think "American military base" you think
Pearl Harbor; a huge, sprawling, military mini-city
bustling with people and bristling with weapons.
There are actually only 34 of those and they're
almost all in friendly countries like Italy,
Germany, and Japan who enjoy being paid handsomely
to host them.
What the Left did to spread this particular lie
was to find a commie author who looked up the
Base Structure Report for 2007 where they list
every single piece of property that the American
military ever heard of. This rat bastard
author then looks at the total at the bottom of the
list and claims we have 737 military bases when in
fact, he's counting a rented storage closet or 3
guys in rented building the size of a small house
in Aruba as the same type of base we have in Pearl
Harbor! Yep, those other 3 guys that we have at our
"military base" in Norway sure are furthering our
imperialist empire expansion there! If somebody
wants to discuss whether 34 bases around the world
is too many, fine, we can talk about that. The
"...737 military bases around the world" is
just BS.
So the KGB Broadcasting Network interviews the
commie toad that wrote this book, and spreads the
juicy but phony talking point about the 737
colonialist-oppressor-Evil-Empire-America military
bases and it percolates down from there. Before you
know it, Ron Paul is repeating it on FNC as if it
were fact when all it is is Marxist propaganda.
This is just one small example but that's the
way it works.
BEHOLD, COMRADE! The KGB Broadcasting
Network is on the air!
Too bad it's right here in America.
On over 700 stations, in
48 states, every day,
plus 2 channels on
DISH and a channel on
DirecTV
The KGB Broadcasting Network
It's a malignant disease spreading
throughout the whole country!
Every KGB Broadcasting Network station is like a
truck carrying pods into your community. There are
over 700 of them in the US creating Marxist
pod-people every day. No, we're not kidding. Once a
person has been brainwashed by propaganda, there is
nothing you can do with them. They are lost. No
amount of facts, evidence, or argument is likely to
change their minds, even if what they believe is
not in their own best interests.
We call them the "KGB Broadcasting Network"
because the content might just as well have come
from the KGB. The KGB did have a long and
documented history of creating and distributing
propaganda and they (or the same people) are
probably still at it. Unfortunately, our own
homegrown Marxists have attained enough momentum
that the KGB, or its successor, the FSB isn't even
necessary any more.
The flagship poseur news program of the KGB
Broadcasting Network is called "The War and Peace
Report" brought to you by DemocracyNow! and hosted
by Amy "Useful Idiot" Goodman
 |
They're on radio and TV and this is
their website. You can find out where
the disease vector station nearest you
is by looking at their
station list here.
|
 |
FSTV, which is a 24/7 satellite TV
channel on DISH, is the primary
transmission vector
for Amy "Useful Idiot" Goodman.
They run her Marxist propaganda several
times a day but, when they're not doing
that, they run an array of other
Marxist "crockumentaries" and
"programming"
|
Amy "Useful Idiot" Goodman
This is the "useful eediot" that Yuri Bezmenov
refers to that makes DN happen. Her name is Amy
Goodman. She started out at WBAI, New York, the
east coast affiliate of Pacifica. It's a difficult
story to follow but, our guess is that she knew her
production had potential and she wanted control
(and the money that came with it), so there was a
temporary falling out between her and Pacifica
while her show expanded. Pacifica now carries her
show again.
She's a sock-puppet that gets used by people
like Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, et.al. [Pardon us
while we mutter expletives under our breath.] Ward
Churchill is one of her buds. She's a mouthpiece
and facilitator for every vile, Marxist
propagandist there is. Ever wonder where those
retard kids that wear the T-shirts with the image
of Che Guevara on them get the idea that it's
"cool" to wear the picture of that psychopathic,
mass murderer? Or the Zero campaign headquarters
with the Che posters on the wall? On the
anniversary of Che's demise, she spends 45 minutes
of a national radio and TV broadcast in effect,
glorifying him.
Want to hear a commie author trash Christians
as fascists? How about a "news" report from an
unknown source claiming the American military
randomly carpet bombed a Muslim civilian
neighborhood with an unknown translator for a
plaintive off-screen victim named "Mohammed"?
(No, we're not kidding. Let's go to Iraq and see
if we can find the guy named "Mohammed" to verify
he really said that stuff. What network do you
think she got this footage from?)
Just fire up her show -
you name the stupid, Marxist, Big-Lie crap,
she's got it.
She's the one that thinks that PBS/NPR are
corporate shills for Halliburton. She's so far
out there, she can't even recognize her own
teammates.
The really scary part about all of this is that
the KGB Broadcasting Network only amounted to 5,
crappy little urban FM stations from the '50's into
the '80's. Just 5 crappy little stations with no
TV. With the advent of reasonably cheap satellite
technology and the concerted effort by the Left to
build and promote community radio stations, and
then push their propaganda into "mainstream" public
broadcasting stations, their
reach went from those 5 crappy little stations to
well over 700 in less than 10 years.
Look at the growth curve:
Studio in 2002
Budget: probably not quite a $1m
Employees: 4
Stations: Unknown but less than 100
|
Studio in 2009
Budget: Probably well in excess of $6m
Employees: Probably in excess of 25
Stations: more than 700
|
Ok, so their studio isn't exactly Fox News.
That's not the point. Look at what their budget
has been doing:
Their IRS Form 990's show the following:
Democracy Now! Productions Inc. NY 2003
$1,331,943
Democracy Now! Productions Inc. NY 2004
$2,623,202
Democracy Now! Productions Inc. NY 2005
$4,069,130
Democracy Now! Productions Inc. NY 2006
$5,365,470
Extrapolation of this curve would indicate that
they are probably spending in excess of
$8,000,000 per year at present. And that
doesn't count any freebies they get from other
Lefty outfits. The Left is famous for coming up
with dozens, if not hundreds of organizations, all
doing each other favors, so you never get the big
picture.
Three years ago it was
reported "The skeletal four-person crew has
ballooned to twenty-seven full and part-time
staff, including seven radio and TV producers,
two outreach organizers and, yes, a professional
archivist."
Their staff page currently
lists 20 people, which probably doesn’t
count lower level employees and interns.
If this
propaganda ramp-up
doesn't scare the crap out of you,
you're not paying attention.
Guess what!? They have a new affiliate!
It's bad enough that they take every
opportunity to trash America and our
military both here and in Europe, now they
can do it all over the Middle-East!
And look who's a friendly guest on the
KGB Broadcasting Network lauding Amy and
her program. The righteous face of the
"reasonable" Left, PBS's Bill Moyers. What
a surprise. NOT.
Alan Dershowitz, not exactly a John
Birch Society member,
said of Amy
Goodman’s program ,
"Democracy Now! is the
Pravda of the airways."
Captain Obvious is getting
frustrated.
 |
Let's not forget
LinkTV. This is
the Soros funded, international
propaganda exchange channel.
It's on DISH and DirecTV. They take
the KGB Broadcasting Network from
here in America and send it to
Europe. They also take propaganda
originating in Europe and bring it
here. On the same day on LinkTV, we
found a pro Sami Al-Arian and a pro
Castro "crockumentary" and those
were just the ones that were
obvious. Even we get tired of
wading through the volume of Marxist
crap out there.
|
 |
Then there's
Pacifica.
They carry Amy but the rest of their
stuff makes Amy look like Jim Lehrer.
They only claim around 100 stations but
the content is appalling.
|
In 2007 the Ford Foundation
spent $97 million dollars in the United States on
"peace and social justice" and "knowledge,
creativity, and freedom". This is WAR, not "media
bias." Outside the US, they spent another $56
million dollars.
PBS and NPR
You're already familiar with what they do. They
aren't raving lunatics like Keith Goelbermann. They
prefer the "kinder, gentler" form of
indoctrination. Like proceeding from faulty
premises. They take their cues from the KGB
Broadcasting Network. Bill Moyers, is the
discredited 1960's Marxist that takes "Bush
Lied-People Died" and stretches it out into a whole
paragraph so it isn't so obvious that he's just
another Amy "Useful Idiot" Goodman. He's a regular
propaganda industry unto himself because his
production company produces a lot of the garbage
that passes for "crockumentaries" on PBS. As well
as the usual Bill Moyers tripe, they're also
starting to get a lot of programming by way of
ITVS which is funded by the Soros and the
Ford Foundation. You can expect that as conditions
in America deteriorate, the propaganda content will
increase.
It appears that the strategy of the Marxists is
to gradually displace the usual "kinder, gentler"
propagandizing that PBS/NPR does by using the
"shelf space" approach that businesses use. General
Mills understands that there is only so much space
on the shelf at the grocery store. It is in their
interest to crowd out any competition, like
products from Post, in that limited shelf space.
They want to produce as many products as possible,
even when the ingredients are just wheat and lots
of sugar, and then pay the grocer to put as many of
them as they can on the shelf.
As you can see from the table at the bottom of
the page, Marxist enablers like the Ford Foundation
and Soros are pumping huge sums of money into
content creators. In particular, ITVS is a
major recipient and has become an important player
in producing content for PBS. Where content used to
be produced primarily by PBS member stations, they
may be getting pushed out of the "shelf space" by
Marxist funded independent producers.
WGBH-Boston gets half a million, ITVS gets ten
times that much.
ITVS is increasingly used for content that
airs on PBS.
ITVS is a
front group for leftwing money to insinuate
itself into public broadcasting and send/receive
leftwing propaganda internationally. In 1999,
ITVS helped launch LinkTV which is the Soros
international satellite propaganda exchange
channel. ITVS works closely with the likes of
foundations like the William and Flora
Hewlett Foundation, Ford Foundation and John D.
and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
They have also
established a network of relationships with
both public and private broadcast outlets including
PBS series such as Wide Angle, FRONTLINE/World,
P.O.V., Independent Lens and Secrets of the Dead
and the PBS WORLD digital channel’s Global
Docs series, and commercial channels such as
Sundance Channel, IFC, National Geographic
Channel, The Documentary Channel and LINK TV.
In addition, ITVS International has developed
distribution deals with digital and mobile outlets
such as JAMAN, AOL, CURRENT [Al Gore's
propaganda channel) and iThentic.
You may not realize the extent to which the BBC
is now being aired on public broadcasting stations.
The BBC is a British government owned and operated
broadcasting operation. It used to be that if you
wanted to listen to the official organ of the
socialist British government, you had to tune in to
it via shortwave radio. Not any more. The BBC is
all over public radio stations, sometimes more than
three hours a day. We monitor them every day
and half the time we're wondering what planet
they're on. It's like an alternate reality.
Remember, the BBC represents an emasculated,
socialist society in decline and their reporters
have been widely characterized as terrorist
apologists. During the beginning of the war in
Afghanistan, a BBC reporter was ordered removed
from one of their own ships in the Persian Gulf for
his biased reporting. When the British military
is ejecting their own BBC reporters, it must be
bad. Believe us, it is.
As you can see, PBS/NPR isn't just Kermit the
Frog anymore.
In 2005, the Ford Foundation
spent $50.5 million dollars on public
broadcasting. This is WAR, not "media
bias."
The Right thinks non-commercial public
broadcasting is a waste. The Marxists don't see it
that way and they're winning. Would a winner spend
this kind of money if they weren't getting their
money's worth?
From:
Here
| Public Television System |
Millions |
| Public Broadcasting Service |
10.000 |
| Independent Television Service |
5.000 |
| Sundance (Soros) Documentary
Fund |
5.000 |
| National Minority Consortia |
1.750 |
| WGBH |
0.500 |
| |
|
| Public Radio System |
|
| National Public Radio |
7.500 |
| Public Radio International |
2.500 |
| Public Radio Exchange |
1.500 |
| Public Radio Capital |
2.000 |
| |
|
| New Public Media Ventures |
|
| OneWorld US |
1.250 |
| New America Media |
2.000 |
| Link TV |
4.500 |
| |
|
| Policy and Sustainability |
|
| Center for Social Media |
3.000 |
| Nonprofit Finance Fund |
4.000 |
| |
|
| Total |
$50.50 |
How much has the Right
spent on non- commercial, public broadcasting
lately? <crickets>
Are you old enough to remember when Buckley was
on PBS? Conservatives used to know that
non-commercial broadcasting was important to
do. While we think it's a mistake to attempt to
debate professional gasbags like Chomsky, that
doesn't mean we shouldn't be in that
battlespace.
If you like details, you can download a study
we did on what the Left is spending and where by
clicking here.
One of the "Good Guys" in DC,
Capital
Research, commissioned this study
on the Left's media efforts at our
suggestion.
This is WAR, not "media bias"
In the past when you saw some reporter's obvious
liberal tendencies creeping into his work, that
might just have been bias, bad editing, or a lame
producer. What the Marxists are doing today is
waging WAR and your country and your children are
the target.
When somebody spends tens of
millions of dollars annually and hundreds of
millions in a few years to promote Marxist,
ideological propaganda, that isn't "media bias."
The Marxist Left is spending amounts of money akin
the budget of a foreign government.
In 2005, the Ford Foundation
spent $50.5 million dollars on public
broadcasting. This is WAR, not "media
bias."
We've come across a lot of pompous,
self-proclaimed authorities on the media from the
Right who dismiss non-commercial public
broadcasting as an inconsequential waste. The
Marxists don't see it that way and they're winning.
Would a winner spend this kind of money if they
weren't getting their money's worth?
Do you think that they would have spent this
kind of money in 2005 if they weren't thinking
about how it might influence the election in
2008?
ITVS is packed with Marxists, and the Sundance
Documentary Fund is a front for Soros. They spent
more money on obviously Marxist outfits than they
did on PBS-TV. There is absolutely no pretense
about what they're doing on LinkTV and they pumped
4.5 million dollars into it.
From:
Here
| Public Television System |
Millions |
| Public Broadcasting Service |
10.000 |
| Independent Television Service |
5.000 |
| Sundance (Soros) Documentary
Fund |
5.000 |
| National Minority Consortia |
1.750 |
| WGBH |
0.500 |
| |
|
| Public Radio System |
|
| National Public Radio |
7.500 |
| Public Radio International |
2.500 |
| Public Radio Exchange |
1.500 |
| Public Radio Capital |
2.000 |
| |
|
| New Public Media Ventures |
|
| OneWorld US |
1.250 |
| New America Media |
2.000 |
| Link TV |
4.500 |
| |
|
| Policy and Sustainability |
|
| Center for Social Media |
3.000 |
| Nonprofit Finance Fund |
4.000 |
| |
|
| Total |
$50.50 |
In 2007 the Ford Foundation
spent $97 million dollars in the United States on
"peace and social justice" and "knowledge,
creativity, and freedom". This is WAR, not "media
bias." Outside the US, they spent another $56
million dollars.
If you like details, you can download a study we
did on what the Left is spending and where by
clicking
here.
One of the "Good Guys" in DC, Capital
Research, commissioned this study on the Left's media
efforts at our suggestion.
How much did the Right spend
on non-commercial, public broadcasting lately?
<crickets>
They're here already! You're next!
"You're in danger! Can't you see?
They're after you! They're after all of us!
Our wives, our children, everyone! They're
here already! You're next! You're next!
You're next!"
Most people don't realize how well established
authentic Marxists are, right here in America.
Usually when you talk about them people think
you're Art Bell talking about aliens. They
really are here and they're not hard to find - if
you bother to look for them.
We know they use the media, and the KGB
Broadcasting Network in particular, as propaganda
"change agents." One of the easiest places
to find and identify them is in academia. Most of
them aren't as flamboyantly stupid as Ward
Churchill. Most of them are relatively low-key
although they do get a kick out of publishing a lot
of their swill which makes them easier to find.
David Horowitz has done a
really good job of documenting the Marxists in
academia. We won't go into it here except to ask
you to take a quick look at the pages in the
following links. This "Marxism 2000 - the
party's not over" conference was held at
UMass-Amherst - which isn't particularly
surprising. You might be surprised to learn that
this webpage was hosted by one of their fellow
travelers on a Notre Dame webserver.
Scroll down the list and note how many of these
Marxists there are, what university they work
at, and look over the presentation content.
These tapeworms are mostly working at state
universities, are probably tenured, and were
probably using your tax dollars to fly across
the country to this Marx-fest.
Remember that the KGB Broadcasting Network is
their favorite programming and these degenerate
tapeworms are teaching your children.
Marxism
2000 Conference Schedule
By the way,
The same organizers are still at it.
David Ruccio, Marxist pod-person See
sidebar, PermaSmile of Evil
Just in case you thought we were kidding about
the
Notre Dame connection, here he is. Why not tell
the ND alumni you know to give ND a call,
particularly if they're an alumni donor, and ask
them why they're running a MARXIST
INDOCTRINATION CENTER.
The following image was captured from
http://rethinkingmarxism.org/cms/
on 090717. RETHINKING MARXISM is the rag of the
organizers of that Marxism 2000 conference. Read
the description of the latest issue of their rag
below and note the emphasis on Antonio
Gramsci and the Frankfurt School.
We won't go into the Frankfurt School here but you
need to look into it.
Marxist crap-ism: "...analyzing the
changing modalities of social reality"
Translation: "...analyzing how well
we've brainwashed America so far and how
can we do it better".
Antonio Gramsci (here's
a bio by a fan of his) was a 1920's Italian
communist. The shorthand version of his theory
was that because the unenlightened masses of the
West actually liked being free of
Marxism, they gave their consent to being
oppressed by their own governments. Since it
would be unlikely that there would be a "Workers
of the world unite!" violent communist
revolution in the west, what they needed to
do was to marginalize and destabilize the
institutions that hold together a stable
society, i.e., change the culture in a gradual
manner - and then they could take over
and save you from yourselves.
So far, they get an A for achievement. Since
the '60's, we get an F for being asleep at the
wheel.
When somebody tells you the Marxists have a
decades long plan to infest and destroy this
country like the termites they are, and remake it
into their vision of Marxist feudalism, it isn't
the ravings of some closet, tinfoil hat wearing
conspiracy nutjob waiting for the black
helicopters, it's right there on the Marxist's own
websites for anybody that bothers to look and these
people are crawling all over the place like
cockroaches.
We once mentioned to Mr. Horowitz that we had a
standing offer that from the comfort of a computer
chair, we could take the name of any state
university in the US and in less than 20 minutes
find at least 3 published communists on their
staff. His reply was "That's a sucker
bet."
Notice that this Marxist indoctrination center
at Notre Dame started with a "pod-person"
from UMass- Amherst, a well known Marxist spawning
ground. Remember the big hubbub over Zero speaking
at the Notre Dame commencement? What a joke!
They're running a Marxist indoctrination center,
they invited a Marxist to speak there, and we're
supposed to get upset by that? Nothing to see
here, move along.
Conservative Crash Dummies
Conservatives remind us of the Crash Dummies.
Seems like we're always crashing from one Marxist
organized crisis to another. Y'know why? Because
it's not in our nature to spend our lives trying to
manipulate and control other people's lives so we
forget that manipulation and control is Job
One of Marxists.
Time after time, whether it's immigration
"reform" or now it's healthcare "reform", you have
to ask yourself, "Would this endless parade of
manufactured crises have happened in the '50's?"
Oh, no! Another Lefty crisis! Oh, no! Quick, raise
$5m and run some commercials on TV!
Wouldn't it be better to get it into the
American consciousness what Marxism is and why it's
bad so that these things never see the light of a
legislative day in the first place?
Conservatives need to stop thinking
short-term 30 sec commercials for 2 weeks every 4
years or every time we're staring at another impact
test-wall and start thinking about a long-term,
daily presence.
Conservatives don't have a problem with their
message, they have a problem *distributing* their
message.
The Right is great at complaining, they’re
great at holding Mutual Admiration Society
meetings, and they’re great at losing
communications wars. It remains to be seen if
they’re great at figuring out what the Left
is doing so successfully and then putting their
money where their mouths are. What the Left is
doing so successfully is producing propaganda and
then making sure it gets distributed.
Content production without distribution is a
waste - another lesson the Right has yet to
learn. We heard one guy bragging about how he blew
$2 million dollars on a documentary that maybe
20,000 people saw with another 10 of those in works
that are guaranteed to get a similarly tiny
audience. Another guy was bragging about how he
blew $5 million on anti-Zero ads just before the
election. The Right brags about how in 5 years they
managed to sell 500,000 conservative content
dvd’s. Yeah, a 100,000 dvd's a year is great,
compared to what? Glenn Beck hits 20 times that many
people EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is nothing short of
pathetic.
Communications is a numbers game.
The more people see/hear it, and the more often
they see/hear it, the better it works.
So...let’s waste millions of dollars on stuff
nobody sees, or only sees for 2 weeks every 4
years. What is wrong with this picture?
With a small portion of the money wasted on
anti-Zero TV ads in the last election, which were
too little, too late, here today, gone tomorrow,
conservatives could have had a 24/7 satellite TV
channel that could have aired what little film and
TV content we have. We could have had several hours
a week of advanced, conservative public radio
content for the next several years that would have
reached hundreds of thousands of listeners every
week. We could have made an attempt to become
the media instead of whining like some snot- nosed
Liberal about the opposition’s media. We
could have started doing what the Marxist Left has
been doing all along. But nooooooooo,
we’d rather work ourselves into a crisis-mode
frenzy and waste tons of money (feeding the very
media that is trying to kill us) on a few
commercials that run at 3am for 2 weeks every four
years that nobody will remember except the
people who paid for them.
We’re not getting our butts kicked with
AK-47’s and RPG’s, we’re getting
our butts kicked with well produced and well
distributed Leftwing propaganda. Instead of
breaking out their checkbooks and doing something
about it, the Right would rather assume the mantle
of Leftwing whiner victimhood.
We keep hearing "We’ve got to get back to
the grassroots!" Well, when you go into a community
full of people that have already been brainwashed
by the Left’s media machine, exactly who the
hell is going to show up at the grassroots meeting?
The Left is out on Main Street every day passing
out their commie handbills (public broadcasting)
while the Right is holding a meeting in the
basement of an industrial building on the outskirts
of town and they didn’t bother to tell
anybody where and when it was going to happen (the
Internet).
"If a policy paper falls in a
think-tank and nobody is there to see it, does it
make a sound?"
The Internet will save us - NOT
Everybody spends all day on the
Internet, don't they?
Proper news/talk radio is relatively expensive
to do and TV/film is a lot more expensive than
that. Since RIGHTALK shut down its Internet radio
operations, what passes for Internet radio on the
Right these days is almost always amateur-hour,
lame-o podcast, conference-call-on-the-Internet,
me-and-my-friends-listen-to-each-other,
alleged-talk-radio. The Mormon
Tabernacle Choir has more members than
most Internet radio shows have listeners and
that’s the problem.
The Right is preaching to the choir and talking
to itself. Just like most blogs. Despite all of the
enthusiasm with the blogs and the wannabe Internet
radio shows, the only thing that matters at this
point is influencing large numbers of the
public in a hurry. The few supposedly
right-leaning websites that are the biggest are
usually just RINO repositories and they're subject
to deliberate attempts by Marxist trolls who raise
the "noise level" and diffuse and misdirect.
Assuming the general public are Internet news
junkies like the conservative establishment tells
their donors they are, and that the public is going
to come home after a hard day at real work like
plumbing or construction and spend hours scouring
the Internet for obscure conservative web content
is a colossal mistake. America still
lives in TVLand and RadioLand, not InternetLand and
if the first media you’re trying to reach
them with is more complicated than an on/off
switch, a volume control, and a channel changer,
forget it.
Speaking of pathetic and the Internet,
conservatives would be hard pressed to come up with
a bigger "new-media" draw than Ann Coulter
televised Live From CPAC! on the Internet
right? Yeah well, that drew a grand total of 3700
viewers. That’s the equivalent of one
good-sized highschool out of the entire United
States. How much more evidence does the Right need
before it dawns on them that the Internet alone
is not going to save the day? Enough already
with the frigging
Internet-think-tanking-blog-web-wanking until the
Right has at least, the same non-commercial Radio
and TV distribution comparable to the Left and then
eventually an additional broadcast channel like
Fox.
The Left is *much* smarter than the Right
when it comes to messaging and message
distribution. They understood that you have to
get your distribution in place FIRST, then
worry about the content. They understood that you
need traditional media to feed people to your
website – not the other way around –
not wasting money on websites that nobody will ever
know are there. The establishment Right relies on
the Internet because it’s cheap. It’s
also ineffective when you don’t have
traditional media to run up espirit de corps and
drive people to your Internet efforts. This
website, like the rest of them, represents one
atomic particle of Internet in an entire galaxy of
Internet. It's a minor miracle that you're
reading it. If Glenn Beck mentioned it on his show,
the server would crash under the load in seconds.
See what we mean? TV/Radio FIRST,
Internet second.
Ever heard of these guys? This is a good
example of how hard it is to herd the cats of the
Right and what happens when the Internet is all you
have and you don't get a lot of major media
exposure. The Left has moron.org which among other
things, does time-sensitive, targeted email
fundraising like:
"Dear Useful Idiot,
Congress will be voting on H.R. 1234 on
Friday. This fascist bill introduced by the
evil capitalist reactionary imperialist
corporate lackey running dog Republicans will
allow Big Business to throw old ladies into the
street, starve children, discriminate against
[fill in the list of oppressed
minorities], and stomp cute little kittens
to death right in your district! We need the
vote of your Congressman, Wishywashy Clueless,
to save those kittens, restore democracy, and
promote social justice! Without the funds to
pressure your Congressman, those kittens will
surely die, so please make your check for $50
payable to moron.org today!"
You get the drift. They raise $100m a year that
way outside of what they get from Soros. The Right
needs to be able to raise a lot of money using the
same technology the Left uses and they could do it
without threatening to stomp cute little kittens to
death. That's what those guys are trying to do; set
up the web technology to raise the kind of money
moron.org does for the Right. It's a good idea, a
good use for the Internet, and should have been
done a long time ago. Does the general public even
know they exist? How many major media interviews
have their people gotten?
moron.org got their startup capital from Soros
but so far, we haven't got anybody comparable on
our side to get those guys going. Without any major
media exposure and with too many of the
"conservative leaders" and "activist organizations"
seemingly only looking out for #1, how long will it
take?
The Internet is a great
secondary resource. We can't afford to keep making
it the primary resource.
The Mercenaries
DC villagers going after heretics
Another problem we have is that there are
entrenched legions of people making a living off
being a “conservative activist” with
little or nothing to show for it. And if they
didn't have a website, you wouldn't know they
exist. Everybody and his brother are hitting you up
for $50 donations and you've probably sent a few of
those checks out. Since the major media is what
influences the most amount of people, how many of
those organizations begging for money get any media
coverage? It's fine that they may do research and
email you when it's time to call your rep but
that's only half of what needs to be done. TV
and radio are force-multipliers.
In the following discussion, bear in mind
that we're not talking about everybody in DC here;
there are a number of "Good Guys" doing great work
that deserves and needs to be supported. Having
said that...
We can't tell you how many times we've
encountered conservatives or Republicans who have
some great idea about promoting a cause and in an
instant, the next thing they're worrying about is
how they can make a buck off it. Reminds you of
politicians doesn't it? In the old days, a
politician temporarily left his regular career to
go perform some public service then they went back
home. Today, they go to DC to "represent the folks
back home" but wind up becoming career politicians
and it seems a lot of them are more concerned with
making a buck than doing what they went there for
in the first place. Reminds us of a lot of some
conservative "activists."
The ideal politicians of old who already made
their money and didn't have to use their office to
get rich, made a personal sacrifice in time and
effort. They didn't "need the money." Pick an
organization. Look up their IRS form 990 to see who
is getting paid what. Do an analysis of what other
organizations were founded by the same guys or
operate under the same umbrella organization.
Notice that the heads of those organizations draw a
salary from sometimes half a dozen or more of them,
totaling in the hundreds of thousands.
We understand that living in and around DC isn't
cheap and not everybody starts out as a "gentleman
of leisure" so they can afford to just play
activist for fun. On the other hand, our guess is
that very few of them put up very much of their own
money for anything. Drawing a $400,000 salary
aggregated from 8 different organizations with the
same street address is a little disingenuous, isn't
it? If what they're doing is really that valuable,
why obfuscate it?
The revolutionary new approach of the Right in
the aftermath of the installation of a Marxist
pResident seems to be "Let's put up some more
websites that nobody will know exist but make sure
that PAYPAL button is right in your face just in
case!"
There’s a website out there claiming to be
fighting the Fairness Doctrine to help "keep Rush
on the air" with a prominent "Contribute" button on
it. Maybe we just fell of the turnip truck but we
think Rush and his $440 million dollars can take
care of himself just fine without this website
suckering the unwitting of the Right out of $20
donations just so these guys can keep their fat
butts in donuts. Way to go guys, our check is in
the mail. NOT. By the way, if you do a
little digging to find out who's behind this, you
would be shocked as well as ticked off.
If you were to start the “Mom & Apple
Pie Research and Education Foundation” to
allegedly promote conservative values and went to
20 conservative funders and got $20,000 from each
of them, what would your total responsibility for
results be? Answer: $20,000 or less. Nobody expects
you to be able to change the world with $20,000 and
your responsibility for results is limited to the
maximum amount you got from a single donor.
On the other hand, if you went to one or two
donors and said
“I need another $400,000
this year”
they’d ask you,
“What did you do with the
$400,000 we gave you last year?”
and you answered
“I wrote a few columns that
nobody read on a website that nobody knows is
there”
they’d tell you to get lost.
That’s the difference between the Left and
Right. The Left has a small number of large funders
who aggregate and direct their money to outfits
that produce results. The Right has a larger number
of relatively small funders which allows for *a
lot* of bodies with an entitlement attitude. We've
seen it, first-hand. How about 3 guys sucking up
$300k+/yr salaries who write a dime-a-dozen
email column that maybe 150 people read.
Think that's a good use of $1m worth of $50 checks?
Looks like 600 lbs of FAT to us. And what
possible justification could there be for this?
"I'm a righteous conservative and I've been talking
to myself for 20 years. I deserve to make $325k a
year for that." Sigh.
You could fire 50% of the “conservative
activists” in and around DC sucking up
$75k-$400k/yr salaries and nobody would notice or
care. Except the ones who got fired of
course.
“Let’s send out some more
fundraising letters and emails so we can continue
to make a good living sending out more fundraising
letters and emails.”
By the way, if you mention this scenario in
conservative or Republican establishment circles,
you might as well be calling the Pope a child
molester in the middle of the Vatican. On
Sunday. At a public mass. Be prepared for the DC
villagers to come after you with torches and
pitchforks like a scene from an old horror
movie.
And what about the other
50% of the conservative organizations that
are doing great work that
deserves and needs to be supported? In the
absence of major media exposure, the work they're
doing isn't as effective as it could be. Sigh.
What can we do about all of this?
Let's see...
-
We could start our own TV and Radio
Networks like Fox did or buy CBS. Hmmmm
that would take billions of dollars. We
don't know any billionaires, do you? Ok,
scratch that.
-
We could buy MSDNC or CNN, fire 85%
of their talent and producers and start
from scratch.
Hmmmm. That would cost billions too and
we don't think we want Keith or Christianne
stalking us. Scratch that one too.
-
We could try and buy the New York
Times, but even if we could wrest it
away from Pinch and the bankster
stockholders for the billions they'd want,
we'd still have to fire 75% of the people
that work there and their reputation is so
damaged as it is, and we'd have to take the
[gag] Boston Globe with it... Are you sure
we want to get near something that stinks
on ice like this?
Yeah, scratch buying the NYT.
Hmmmmmm. If only there was a satellite network
we could put our stuff up on that would make it
available to a whole bunch of stations without it
costing billions of dollars, then we could work on
getting individual stations to carry our programs.
Maybe some people could watch the video stuff right
off the satellite. There might be a few radio
stations that would actually want to carry
our programs. Maybe the people that watch the stuff
right off satellite could record it and get friends
who have cable to run it on cable-access
channels.
Damn! If only there was.....
HEY WAIT A MINUTE, WE'VE GOT
AN IDEA, WHAT IF WE PUT OUR STUFF UP ON PUBLIC
BROADCASTING AND DISH AND DIRECTV JUST LIKE THE
LEFT DOES!!!???
"You idiot! Did you drag me to the
bottom of this endless site to suggest that we have
something to do with those PBS/NPR maggots? I HATE
THOSE PEOPLE! And besides, nobody listens to that
crap, it's boring! We oughta pull the taxpayers
money out from under them tomorrow and watch their
sorry, commie asses go right down the drain. Have
you lost your mind?"
The Excuses To Do Nothing
This is where we really start getting really
irritated. Sorry if our expectations for
self-described conservative Republican leaders and
activists are a step higher than if we were
calling Walmart to find out how late they were
open. For over a year, we tried to convince the
conservative/Republican establishment types that
expanding our messaging base using non-commercial
broadcasting needed to be done and was the only
reasonable alternative we had available to us.
Usually, we'd run into some blender-head child they
hired to answer the phone and we'd get
"Brawndo's
got what plants crave!"
If, after weeks of trying, we actually got past
the idiot children, we'd get one of the
excuses to do nothing listed below. That
is, assuming they were on the phone long enough to
put their brains in gear and come up with an
excuse. A small number of people would actually
listen. The number of people that actually get
it, knew it had to be done, and would do so
much as lift a finger, make a call, offer a
suggestion, or forward our stuff on, you could
count on one hand. We would have had better luck
selling Electrolux vacuum cleaners door-to-door.
Most of them seemed to view any idea except
theirs as a threat to their funding.
We'd really enjoy reeling off the names of the
shallow, vapid, insulting, lying, and otherwise
useless people we spoke to - as well as the
sharp, thoughtful folks that actually recognized a
problem and a potential solution and offered what
help they could. We haven't identified them
before and we won't. We do have a long memory
though.
Hey, y'know who most of these people remind
us of..............? POLITICIANS!!!
Question: Would anybody put up with this kind
of abuse for an entire year if they didn't really
believe what they were saying?
Here's the list of the usual EXCUSES TO DO
NOTHING.
-
"Nobody listens to that crap! It's
boring!"
First of all, it's a circular argument.
Second, it's willfully ignorant. There are
2.3 million Republicans listening to
news/talk format public radio every week,
an audience bigger than Don Imus' audience,
and these are the most educated, affluent
radio listeners in any radio market
segment. If you want to talk to somebody
about some issue that doesn't lend itself
to 2 minutes like tax reform,
wouldn’t you want to talk to a
Lexus-driving small business owner with a
degree and a stock portfolio?
-
"Hey, we've got Rush, Hannity,
Savage, what's the problem?"
Let's assume for the sake of argument
that Rush is General Patton and the rest
are his Allies. The Left
controls/dominates:
-
Film
-
Commercial Television
-
Public radio
-
Public television
-
Newspapers/magazines
-
Internet
-
Primary/secondary education
Even Patton would have a hard time with
7:1 odds. If relying solely on Rush and
company were enough to save the day, why do
we have a Marxist pResident? Think a
little “surge” might be in
order?
-
"But...but...I just don't see a
profit in this!"
When somebody is TRYING TO KILL YOU, you
don't ask how much bullets cost, you pony
up whatever it takes and you start
shooting back. The Left is waging Total
War, the Right won’t do anything
unless they can figure out how to make a
profit off of their own demise. It
doesn’t take a rocket scientist to
figure out who is going to win that
one. While these guys claim to be
“conservatives” they’re
just mercenaries.
-
“We should just de-fund public
broadcasting!”
Well, that is not going to happen so
fuggedaboudit. Ask Tom Delay about
that. Conservatives and Republicans need to
GROW UP and stop their little temper
tantrums about public broadcasting. It's
not going anywhere, deal with it. Tax
money only amounts to 15% of their budget
anyway and they wouldn’t even miss a
beat if they lost it. Furthermore,
this argument is simply another excuse
to do nothing. Tax money helped create
this monster. We should not just abandon it
to the Left, we should infiltrate and
subvert it with our own programming.
Besides, the 15% of their budget is a small
price to pay to get into an additional
national broadcast system and it’s
the only place where the right can get the
most bang for their limited bucks. If
you paid for 15% of a shiny, new Corvette,
wouldn’t you also want to come up
with the gas money to drive it around a
little? Huh?
-
"Yeah, yeah, that's a great idea, let
me know how it works out."
This is a nice way of saying “Stay
the <expletive deleted> away from my
donors.”
There are no political or technical barriers to
conservatives producing programming for public
radio and TV and making that programming available
to those stations that would carry it using the
same distribution technology that PBS/NPR uses.
The only legitimate hurdle is getting individual
stations to carry it.
Let's repeat that again so nobody can accuse us
of drinking our own Koolaid. The only
legitimate hurdle is getting individual stations to
carry our programming. Let's talk about
that for a minute.
-
We were indirectly contacted by the
chancellor of a major Texas university
system about how unhappy they were with
their college radio station running Lefty
programming. Come to find out, they were
unhappy with NPR programming. If
that guy had heard what Goodman is pumping
into college stations around the country
his face would have turned red, his eyes
would have bulged out of his head, and he
would have dropped dead of a heart
attack.
-
We got an email from a retired Air Force
guy in central Florida who was positively
foaming at the mouth at something he heard
on Amy's show and he told us how he called
the station manager gritting his teeth
while he complained about it. The woman on
the other end of the phone was very
pleasant and said "Y'know, even
we cringe at some of the stuff we
hear in that program but there's nothing
out there that we can afford to replace it
with."
-
This is important so listen
up. We got a call from a small
station in the Berkshires of the People's
Democratic Republic of Taxxachusetts. He
had a problem. He wasn't a liberal even
though the station was packed with them.
They had run out the period of 1 year where
they could air Amy's KGB Broadcasting
Network for free and were going to have to
start paying her $250 a year to keep airing
it. The KGB Broadcasting Network gives
their stuff away for an entire year before
they ask for a paltry $250 a year to keep
airing it. Now, you wouldn't think that
$250 would be a lot of money to a radio
station but remember, this is a small,
non-commercial station and it is a lot of
money to them. If we could have
given him a daily, 1 hour program cheaper
than $250 a year, he would have taken it,
even if it was conservative programming.
Since we had stopped production by that
time, y'know what he was going to wind up
doing? He was going to wind up paying
Pacifica the $250 which includes Amy, and
then the station would have access to the
rest of Pacifica's lineup which is
flaming WORSE!
Just shoot us now and get it
over with.
The Left has a mountainous ammo dump of
propaganda and they're giving it away to any idiot
who will pick it up and use it against us. We on
the other hand, are trying to SELL dvd's on a
website nobody has ever heard of.
Let's see, free and readily available vs. $20
and almost impossible to find.
Face--->Palm
There ARE individual stations that would take
conservative programming IF we could provide it to
them. Naturally, we wouldn't expect our stuff to
show up on WBUR in Boston any time soon. In fact,
assuming there was sufficient pressure from the
conservative public, some of the stations would
probably start by airing our stuff on weekends at 3
o'clock in the morning. Isn't that still
better than NOTHING?
Every year the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting has to report to Congress on the
complaints it gets from viewers and listeners. The
ONLY complaints they get are from conservatives or
Republicans complaining about their liberal tilt.
If they had even ONE program that wasn't the usual
touchy-feely Marxist crap, wouldn't they be able to
at least try and claim they're "balanced" just like
the law requires public broadcasting to
be?
The real question is whether we could enlist
conservatives to mount a letter and phone campaign
to pressure public broadcasting stations to balance
their lineup. That would mean YOU. Would
YOU be willing to make a few phone calls and write
a letter to one of your local stations urging them
to carry our programming?
When it comes to DISH and DIRECTV, Congress
mandated that they set aside 15% of their satellite
space for non- commercial public broadcasting
purposes and unless we've already allowed the Left
to consume all of that already, we ought to be able
to get channels there. Instead of selling 100,000
dvd's a year, we could expose that video to 100,000
people A WEEK. Maybe more.
So here we are with America’s
heritage being squandered at an exponentially
increasing rate and the Right is still talking to
themselves instead of the public and making
excuses for it.
When whatever you’re doing repeatedly
isn’t working, do something different. If you
want to be successful, look at what successful
people are doing and do *that*. Instead of REacting
to Leftist threats to commercial talk radio, we
ought to be PRO-acting by poking them in the eye
with our own public broadcasting programming.
Hold them to their own standard for a
change.
With few exceptions, the Right establishment
doesn’t understand the value of
communications and furthermore, they don’t
seem to want to understand. They’re perfectly
happy doing exactly what they’ve been doing
all along. In 3 months we could have professionally
produced, conservative programming on public radio.
All it takes is commitment to make it happen.
Non-commercial TV would take a little longer and
more money but we can make that happen too.
Instead, all we've heard is every willfully
ignorant excuse there is; assuming somebody
bothered to answer the telephone and devote 30
seconds to the primary reason we're losing - and
most of the time they couldn't be bothered.
One would think that a Marxist pResident would
have led to an epiphany that doing the same thing
over and over again wasn’t enough. Apparently
not. The Left is laughing all the way to the USSA
and the Right is sending out the same fundraising
letters they were sending out 30 years ago.
It's time to quit whining about being
“disenfranchised” from the opposition's
media and start creating our own.
We’ve heard from a bunch of people that
*know* that the Right needs to expand its
message into public broadcasting, the sticking
point is where is the money to do it. We've had
doors summarily slammed our faces for over a year.
And that’s only counting the people that
actually bothered to answer the door in the first
place. Nobody is in charge and unlike the lemmings
of the Left, organizing the Right
is like
herding cats. Individual pet peeves are more
important than the overall goal and nobody wants
to rock the boat.
With public broadcasting and public radio in
particular, you have an opportunity to provide
those stations willing to take it (they’re
out there, we’ve heard from them) an
alternative to Amy and her Pacifica/KGB
Broadcasting Network. You have an opportunity to
get the most amount of listeners for the least
amount of money. The Right would have an additional
opportunity to talk to the public instead of
continuing to talk to themselves.
Unfortunately, we haven’t been able to get
this concept in front of anybody with the money to
make this happen and the people who *do* have the
money to make it happen have a phalanx of existing
“conservative” non-profit organization
guards around them that makes Fort Knox look like a
brand new Caddie parked at night on a deserted
street in Newark, NJ.
So let’s keep whining to ourselves about
media bias in the opposition’s wholly owned
and operated sandbox.
In the vacuum of conservative
messaging, nobody can hear you scream.
What Are You Prepared To Do?
"Don't just sit there measuring me for a
straight-jacket, do something!
Get on the phone! Call for help!
Don't wait for anybody in DC to do anything
about expanding our message base, you'll die of old
age first. It's a dirty job but somebody's gotta do
it and if nobody else is going to do it, we're
going to have to do it ourselves.
That means the American People. YOU. The
question is,
"What are you prepared to do?"
This is THE GOAL:
Set up the infrastructure to acquire and produce
conservative radio and television programming and
then make it available to non- commercial
broadcasting stations as well as DISH and DirecTV -
just like the Left does.
By the way, if you have already read this
site, you may have come to the conclusion that
the author is "colorful" :) "Colorful" doesn't
mean "lunatic." When we talk about
conservative programming, we're not talking
about flake-mercenaries like Alex Jones who
parrot the Marxist propaganda they were fed
under the guise of patriotism. We're not
talking about
retarded 9/11 conspiracy theories. Nor are
we talking about "he said/she said" chitchat
babble.
To see what kind of programming we're
talking about and what we've produced in the
past, click
here.
This is how we propose doing it:
-
We ask for public comments about whether
this is worth doing. If everybody thinks
this is a dumb idea, we'll just fade away
but it won't be because we didn't try.
-
If we get a positive response, we'll set
up a non-profit and ask for donations.
-
We'll set a goal for X number of dollars
to be raised within a certain amount of
time.
-
We'll limit ourselves to small donations
so we remember who we're working for and
why we started doing this in the first
place.
-
We'll post the amount of money raised so
you can see what it's up to and set up a
mailing list to keep you advised on what's
happening. By the way, we think spamsters
should be shot on sight, so don't worry
about that.
-
If we don't get enough money to do what
needs to be done within the time limit,
we'll cut a check to the Wounded Warrior
project or some other apolitical military
veteran charity so you know that your money
isn't getting spent on cocktail parties and
fancy monkey suits.
-
If we have to cut the check to the
charity, we'll post a copy of the check
right here.
What are YOU prepared to do? We'll tell
you what we were prepared to do. We ran
RIGHTALK radio for 4 years on the Internet out of
our own pockets. Not some donor's money, not
some foundation's money, OUR money. Over a
million dollars of it.
We did real radio on the Internet. We put
on the same "A" list guests that you see on FNC
every day only we put them on for the whole hour,
not just one, 6 minute segment. Up to and including
USSC Justice Clarence Thomas.
We never made a dime off of it and neither did
our show hosts because they put up THEIR money.
We did it because we love our country and wanted
to do what we could to help. We could have done
nothing but instead, we put our money where our
mouths are. We already have most of the the
radio production side of things that we designed
and paid for out of our own pockets so we have a
personal stake in this - we're not just begging
for somebody else to put us in a Mercedes.
So now we're asking you - what are YOU
prepared to do?
Here's what we need to know:
-
Do you believe like we do that
conservatives need to get our message out
any way we can, and that as we've shown,
the only place to do that is in non-
commercial public broadcasting, just like
the Left does?
-
Would you be willing to tell your
conservative friends and associates that
they need to look over this website and
forward this link to your email list?
-
Would you, if we were to ask for it,
support this cause with a $10, 20, or $50
donation(s)?
-
Do you think anybody else would help
support it?
-
Assuming we got to the point of
producing programming, would you and your
friends be willing to call and write your
local station asking them to carry it?
-
Would you be willing to help out with
advertising the idea and programs however
you could?
If so, please send an email to
and don't delay because this is a limited
time offer :)
Remember, we think spamsters should be shot
on sight, so don't worry about that.
Please send a link to this site:
http://www.rightalk.com
out to as many people as you think should know
about it so we can get their input too. Do you
have the ear of a radio or TV person that might
be willing to help publicize this? Please tell
them they need to see this site.
We can also be reached at
1-800-377-3695
Thanks for taking the time, and prayers are
gladly accepted :)
The RIGHTALK
Staff
We asked a few people if they would sign their
names in agreement with the four statements listed
below. David Horowitz actually chewed us out
because they were too bland :)
NOTICE: THE SIGNERS LISTED BELOW HAVE AGREED
WITH THE FOUR STATEMENTS ON THIS PAGE ONLY.
THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING NAMES ON THIS PAGE
DOES NOT, IN ANY WAY, CONSTITUTE AN
ENDORSEMENT OF RIGHTALK OR ANY OF THE CONTENT OF
THIS WEBSITE BEYOND THIS PAGE. THIS IS A
STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT AND THE ONLY THING THE SIGNERS
HAVE AGREED TO ARE THE FOUR STATEMENTS BELOW.
PERIOD.
AGREED:
1. Prevailing programming content in public radio
leans politically Left.
2. Recent
Arbitron radio ratings
surveys show that 33% of public radio
listeners (2.3 million listeners per week) are
Republicans/Independents who lean
Republican.
3. Republicans/Independents who lean Republican,
as well as conservatives, are under-served in
public radio because of a lack of available
programming content that represents their
views.
4. Efforts to produce alternative programming to
serve the Republican/Independent/conservative
audience in public radio should be supported and
encouraged.
SIGNED:
Brian M Johnson, Executive Director - Alliance for
Worker Freedom
Brig. Gen. Jimmy L. Cash USAF (Ret.)
Bruce Thornton, Professor of Classics and
Humanities, California State University
Colin A. Hanna, President - Let Freedom Ring
David Keene, Chairman, American Conservative Union
(ACU)
David Horowitz
Don Crawford, Flipside Show
Floyd G. Brown
Fred Gedrich, Former U.S. Dept of State &
Defense Official
Gail Norton Carver
George Landrith, President - Frontiers of
Freedom
Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret.)
Gerald R. Molen, Film Producer
Grover Norquist
Jerri Lynn Ward J.D.
Kelsey Zahourek, Executive Director - Property
Rights Alliance
Martha Zoller, WDUN
Paul Weyrich, Free Congress Foundation
(Deceased)
Paul Schiffer, Schiffer Report
R. Bruce McColm, Institute for Democratic
Strategies
Rick Tyler, Spokesperson for Speaker Newt
Gingrich
Robert Spencer, Director Jihadwatch
Ryan Ellis, Executive Director, American
Shareholders Association
Tom Delay, Former House Majority Leader
Wayne Simmons, Intelligence Summit
Wes Vernon, Newsman
Who Are These Guys?
RIGHTALK is the brainchild of two men, one a
successful entrepreneur and the other spent over 20
years in the broadcast radio/TV business.
In 2003 after 2 years of proof-of-concept and
design work, it was decided to launch RIGHTALK as
an Internet talk radio format station that would
provide the time to conduct in-depth interviews
with leading conservative newsmakers, policy
makers, think-tanks, and authors. The concept was
to be a conservative alternative to NPR.
Launching a radio operation with features that
rival a large, over-the-air network with 10 percent
of the money and people ordinarily necessary for
such a venture meant that creative workarounds
would be required, particularly in the areas of
system design. Without sacrificing performance,
alternatives to much of the usually extremely
expensive broadcast equipment were found. Drawing
on over two decades of experience in the
communications and broadcast industry meant that we
didn’t have to hire extremely expensive
consultants for broadcast system, computer network,
or telecom design and installation therefore saving
hundreds of thousands of dollars. In four months of
around-the-clock work we turned designs that took
two years to draft from boxes of parts into a
functioning radio network.
Making this happen required startup capital at
great personal sacrifice, aggregating on-air talent
and organizations, talent relations, website
implementation, broadcast, communications, and IT
network system design, specification, construction,
installation, CAD drafting and documentation,
maintenance, media training, and on- air production
and operations.
All of this accomplished by only two men as a
labor of love for their country.
RIGHTALK’s goal was to be a conservative
alternative to NPR. Not the typical amateur-hour,
speakerphone-podcast, RIGHTALK produced "real
radio" - it just happened to be on the Internet.
Monday through Friday, for four years non-stop,
RIGHTALK produced the kind of conservative content
that should be on public broadcasting stations.
RIGHTALK was run essentially as a philanthropy,
i.e., out of our own pockets, because an
Internet-sized audience for the type of programming
that we produced was not then, and is not likely to
be in the future, large enough to be advertiser
supported no matter how good the programming was.
While we are able to do professional grade
broadcasting for a tiny fraction of what it
typically costs, producing the type of high quality
programming that our audience came to expect with a
dozen digital phone lines, ISDN, multiple high
bitrate streams, and fully engineered shows was
still prohibitively expensive. We therefore were
forced to discontinue on- internet operations.
If you have already read this site, you may have
come to the conclusion that the author is
"colorful" :) "Colorful" doesn't mean
"lunatic." When we produced conservative
programming, we didn't traffic in flake- mercenary
garbage like Alex Jones who parrot the Marxist
propaganda they were fed under the guise of
patriotism. We didn't suffer
retarded 9/11 conspiracy
theories.
To see what kind of programming we produced,
click
here.
RIGHTALK can be reached by email at
or by phone at 1-800-377-3695
What exactly do we mean by "conservative
programming" ?
There is no point in merely being a distributor
of shows like "Lincoln Chaffee’s RINOs on
Parade".
Possibilities:
Straight News - sans the usual
Leftward spin and assumptions. Reporters who
would be willing to ask a conservative question
of a "moderate" Republican. This would be a
good way to get entrance into stations, develop
an audience, and use that audience to clamor
for the rest of the programming.
Daily Commentary - from authentic
conservatives on any number of subjects.
National security, national and international
politics, economics, etc.
Book Reviews - Conservative
authors
Public Policy - Exactly where in the
Constitution is the express authorization for
the Federal Govt to be in the housing,
insurance, medical, or any of the other
businesses they are in and how do we get them
out of those businesses? Get the product of
those think tanks the exposure they don’t
have now.
Lifestyle/Culture - On public radio,
an examination of straight, successful, small
business owning, family-centric people might be
considered an "alternate lifestyle". Critical
examination of Marxist influence in media and
culture.
Educational - History, law,
conservative principles, etc. with an emphasis
on personal responsibility and individual
freedom. Example: make available to college
radio stations history course content like that
produced by people like Hillsdale College or
Patrick Henry University. Now that the History
Channel has devolved into The
IceLoggingMonsterUFOPawn Channel, we could use
some more of this.
Environment - A counter to the
Marxist driven climate scams and panic
mongering
Documentaries - Give conservative
documentary makers the exposure they're not
getting now. Unlike the Marxists, we don't have
to lie to make a point. The Marxists are
running their "crockumentaries" around the
clock on DISH and DirecTV, not to mention
public broadcasting stations. Why aren't we
running our material?
To give you an idea what we've done in the past,
see below.
Since launch in 2004, RIGHTALK produced shows
for the following organizations:
Accuracy in Academia
Americans for Tax
Reform
Citizens Against Government
Waste
Freedom Alliance
Free Congress
Foundation
Heritage Foundation
Newt.org
Organization Watch (Capital
Research)
among others.
Previous show hosts included:
Major Gen. Paul Vallely -
FNC Military Analyst
Don Crawford - talk show
host in Austin, TX and Glendale, CA,
Paul Schiffer - radio shows
in Canton, Akron, and Cleveland, nationally with
Radio America, Salem
Marc Morano - CNSNews,
former aide to Minority Environment & Public
Works Committee Chair Jim Inhofe
Martha Zoller - One of
Talkers Magazine "Heavy Hundred" WDUN,
Gainesville, GA
Paul Weyrich - (Deceased)
President/CEO Free Congress Foundation
Rick Tyler, Press Secretary
and Spokesperson, Newt Gingrich,
Rabbi Areyeh Spero
This is just a small sample of the guests
RIGHTALK hosts have put on, many on a regular
basis. These are not lightweight guests and are not
fluff interviews:
General Paul Vallely
Alireza Jafarzadeh - Iran Threat
Andrew McCormack
Ann Coulter
Barry Rubin
Bernie Goldberg
BG Jimmy Cash
Bill Roggio
Brad Blakeman - Freedoms Watch
Brigitte Gabriel - Because they Hate
Bruce McColm - Political Analyst
Capt. Chuck Nash - Fox
Caroline Glick - Jerusalem Post
Claudia Rosette
Cliff May
Daveed Gartenstein Ross
David Horowitz
David Keene - CPAC/ACU
Diana West - CNN " Common Sense
Doug Feith - Former DOD Author "War and
Decisions"
Dr. Mike Evans
Dr. Daniel Pipes - Middle East Forum
Dr. Robert Katz- Intelligence Summit
Dr.Waild Phares
Ed Meese - Former Attorney General
ES Cupp - Author
Frank Gaffney - Center for Security Policy
Fred Gedrich - Former State Department
Greg Corumbus - Talk Show Host DC
JD Hayworth - Former Congressman AZ
Jed Babbin - Human Events
Jerry Molen - Hollywood Produce/ Oscar Winner
Schindler's List
Joel Mowbray - Author
John Loftus - Intelligence Summit
John Batchelor - Talk Show Host NY
Jon Scott - Fox
Ken Timmerman
Lee Kessler - Former Actress Author of The White
King and The Doctor
LTC Ollie North - Fox
LTC Bill Cowan - Fox
LTG Tom McInerney - Fox
Mark Steyn - America Alone
Melanie Phillips - Londonistan
Monica Crowley - Talk Show Host NY
Norine McDonald - Senlis Council
Peter Huessy - National War College
Peter Brookes - Heritage
Professor Andrew Bostom
Professor Ray Tanter - Iran Policy Committee
Ron Kessler - Author
Rowan Scarborough - CIA The Rouge Agency
Wally Shoebat
Wayne Simmons - Ret CIA
Paul Schiffer
Ann Coulter
Bart Bechtel - Former CIA Agent/professor
Bay Buchanan
Bill Federer - Author
Bill Hendon - Former Congressman - Author An
Enormous Crime, the Definitive Account of the Pow
Coverup
Bob Dornan - Former Congressman
Bob Barr - Former Congressman
Christopher Horner - Author of the Politically
Incorrect Guide to Global Warming
Colin Hanah -President of Let Freedom Ring
David Schippers - Former chief Counsel for the
House Impeachment Managers
Dick Morris
General Oleg Kalugin Former KGB
Humberto Fontova -Cuban American/Author
Jack Cashill - Author First Strike and Ron Brown's
Body
Jayna Davis - Investigative Reporter, Author
Oklahoma City Bombing/the Third Terrorist
Jed Babbin - Editor of Human Events and
author
Jerome Corsi - Co-author of Unfit for Command, the
Obama Nation
Jim Inhofe U.S. Senator Oklahoma
Joel Anderson - California State Assemblyman
John Gizzi - Political Editor of Human
Events
John LeBoutiller - Former Congressman
John Oneil and the Swift Boat Veterans, former
POW'S from Vietnam
Joseph Farah - President of
www.worldnetdaily.com
Kenneth Timmerman - Author
Konstantine Phreobrezinski Former KGB COL.
M. Stanton Evans - Conservative Historian - Author
Blacklisted by History, the True Story of Senator
Joseph Mccarthy
Michelle Malkin
Pat Buchanan
Phylis Schlafly - President of Eagle
Forum/Author
Randy Brogdan - Oklahoma State Senator
Robert Baer - Former CIA AGENT - Author of See No
Evil and Sleeping with the Devil
Robert Spencer - Author the Politically Incorrect
Guide to Islam and the Crusades
Rowan Scarborough - Washington Times Writer/Author
of Sabotage
Steve King - Congressman
Thomas Woods - Author of the Politically Incorrect
Guide to American History
Tom Tancredo - Congressman
Tom Delay - Former Congressman and Former House
Whip and House Majority Leader
Tom Fitton - President of Judicial Watch
Virgil Goode - Congressman
Wayne Barnes-Former FBI Special Agent/Long time
Debriefer and friend of Soviet Bloc Defector, Ion
Michai Pacepa
Don Crawford
Alex Garza, Executive Director Minuteman Civil
Defense Corps
Bay Buchanan, Author The Extreme Makeover of
Hillary (Rodham) Clinton
David Barton, Founder of Wallbuilders - Author of
Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution and
Religion
David Limbaugh
Dr. Jonathan Wells Author Politically Incorrect
Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Dr. Kevin Gutzman, Ph.D., Author Politically
Incorrect Guide to the Constitution
Dr. Robert Murphy, Author Politically Incorrect
Guide to Capitalism
Dr. Thomas Woods Author Politically Incorrect
Guide to American History
Jed Babbin Editor Human Events magazine
Jim Kouri--VP, National Association of Chiefs of
Police
Kenneth Timmerman
Paul Ibbetson Author of Living Under The Patriot
Act: Educating A Society
Ramesh Ponnuru
Robert Murphy, Author Politically Incorrect Guide
to Capitalism
Robert Rector, Heritage Foundation
Robert Spencer
Tom Tancredo, Congressman
Martha Zoller
Crane Durham nothingbuttruth.com
Dan Gainor Business and Media Institute
Daveed Gartenstein Ross defenddemocracy.org
Frank Gaffney CenterforSecurityPolicy.org
Kerri Houston
Linda Chavez
Lynn Westmorland Cong.
Marcia Blackburn Cong.
Michael Barone
Micheal Levine lbnelert.com
Phillip Klein American Spectator
Rich Miniter richardminiter.com
Sen. Zell Miller
Tom Price Cong.
Walid Phares WalidPhares.com
Paul Weyrich
In 4 years of uninterrupted broadcasting with
RIGHTALK, was there anyone important Paul had
not put on his show? Not many people can lay
claim to getting Supreme Court Justice Thomas for a
full hour.
We can't tell you how many times we've heard
people laughing at Air America and how it "failed
in the marketplace".
We're not laughing.
Why is it that Republicans and/or conservatives
are always so cocky while they're getting
their butts kicked?
Air America was never supposed to "succeed in
the marketplace." No radio industry person in their
right mind (pardon the pun) would EVER have thought
that the brainless drivel they pumped out would
"succeed."
Air America was an Orwellian Hate-Hour
propaganda exercise and the product was "Bush Lied,
People Died", among other things. It acted as a
source of propaganda cues for the rest of the media
as well as the web-kiddies. It was 100% successful
in that regard and was cheap money compared to
buying TV commercials.
"Uhhh, yeah, a radio show host, yeah,
that's the ticket"
Hypothetically speaking, let's say we're
in the radio business but we're Marxists
instead of conservatives. And hypothetically
speaking, let's say we wanted to get a reliable
Lefty drone into Congress but we didn't want to
have to deal with all of those pesky election
finance laws that limit big donations and - we
wanted to stay under the radar. Remember,
hypothetically speaking, we're Marxists so
the ends always justify the means and the law only
applies to the little people, not to us.
What would we do? Hypothetically speaking
of course.
Hypothetically speaking, we might find
some reliable idiot with pre- existing, national
recognition who could run for office somewhere
where there was weak opposition. Then,
hypothetically speaking, we might make him a
radio show host of ours and pay him 15 times as
much as what his audience numbers would warrant per
year and we might do that for a few years until
unfortunately, we "failed in the marketplace."
Hey, we can't help it if we're bad
businessmen!
Hypothetically speaking, that reliable
stooge that we made the mistake of grossly
overpaying for years might then take a little time
off and then just happen to announce that he
wants to run for Congress but now he just
happens to have a wallet full of millions of
dollars from the radio gig he did for us that
"failed in the marketplace." Sound familiar?
Still laughing?
Ever notice in the major media that
conservatives and/or Republicans always seem to be
"responding" to some Lefty attack? And when they do
respond, two dead guys propped up in front of a
camera and microphone would be more exciting?
People who are always defending against attacks
instead of initiating them are called
LOSERS.
Josef Goebbels understood that you never want to
get bogged down responding to the enemy's
propaganda, you want to out-produce the enemy
with your own message.
The Marxist media understands this too.
"Bush-Lied, People-Died"
takes 2 seconds to repeat and
2 HOURS to rebut
Ding-dong. Anybody home?
In the old days, when the Marxists wanted to
re-write history, they had to go to the trouble of
painting somebody out of the picture. A lot like
the way the Left conveniently forgets what they
said 5 years ago and then rely on nobody in
their media reminding them about it while
they're verbally rewriting history today.
There's also a new Internet twist to the same
game. The
Prelinger Archives are a collection of
public domain Americana films that show the way
things in this country used to be. Those
archives are associated with The
Wayback Machine with stores copies of every
website it can find in perpetuity. That website
also serves as a repository for any video you
want to put up there. Naturally, it's being
diluted and polluted with every piece of Marxist
drivel that the Left can find or produce.
Recently, WorldNetDaily went looking for
copies of Obama's "Fight the Smears" website at
the Wayback Machine and they couldn't find
them......
Now, it is possible to keep them from archiving
your website and it is possible that's what those
Lefty sites did. It's also possible that the pages
they were looking for just hadn't made it into the
system yet. Even if the Wayback Machine would never
tamper with their archives, a website can request
content be removed so don't rely on it.
Guess who controls the Wayback Machine? If you
guessed a bunch of Lefty trusts and foundations,
you get a cookie. Didn't somebody once say
something about "He who controls the past controls
the future"?
So, when you see something important on the web
that might just fall into the "memory hole"
sometime down the road, you might want to archive
it yourself.
What do we mean by "liberal intelligentsia"? You
know who they are but you may not have heard them
called that before. They're the busybody do-
gooders who think they know more about what's good
for you than you do. They think they were put on
this planet to "help" you see the errors of your
Neanderthal ways (or force you if necessary).
They usually have some nebulous college
degree(s) in something that has nothing to do with
math, science, or manufacturing. Lots of them
become professors in made up "social science"
subjects and they couldn't get a job outside of a
state university or government if they tried.
The only time they'll drive a pickup truck is
when they're at their summer home in some wealthy
resort community full of Stepford liberals.
When they head out to their summer home, they
usually try to look like they're "jess plain folks"
but they always get off the plane looking like they
just stepped out of an Eddie Bauer catalog.
Not many of them own guns, they prefer gated
communities in Ritzy neighborhoods full of yuppie
cheese shops and "fern joints".
They're always pontificating about the
downtrodden, disadvantaged, disenfranchised,
etc., but you won't catch them getting anywhere
near the "great unwashed" if they can
possibly avoid it. They prefer going to cocktail
parties dressed with a sweater over their shirt
like Mr. Rogers or wearing those tennis shirts with
little alligators on them where they smugly
congratulate each other on how superior and
enlightened they are.
They display plastic PermaSmiles while they're
trying to convince you how their morally superior
Marxist utopia is going to make your world a better
place but the look in their eyes when you back them
up against the wall with logic says they'd have
somebody else cut your throat in a heartbeat if you
don't go along with the program.
Pardon us while we puke.
Ever wonder where all of those RINO's
came from?
Since the Left controls and/or dominates 7/8
spheres of public influence, they're able to
re-define terms to frame the debate.
For example, they have managed to redefine the
term "conservative" in the public consciousness to
mean every milquetoast, 1960's Democrat with an (R)
after their name.
The effect of this is to re-define actual
conservatives into (in the words of one Manhattan
Institute poseur) "rightwing whackos".
While the terms "Republican" and "conservative"
have never been necessarily synonymous, a good case
could be made that by attacking from so far left,
they have driven what would be considered "normal"
democrats to dilute the Republican party and what
it used to stand for.
The Left has managed to move the center of the
debate like somebody moving the goal posts on the
football field and conservatives have not
effectively dealt with this issue.
Aren't you tired of New York City RINO
lawyers palming themselves off as "conservatives"
and never getting called on it?
Get ready for the same losers and Propaganda
Ministry that brought you McQueeg to try and sell
you on Romney. It's started already. There is an
element of the Republican party who would support
Joseph Stalin if he had an (R) after his name and
they thought he could win. It's a game to them;
principles and convictions have nothing to do with
it. We're not looking for 100%, 85% will do.
Only retards would run open primaries where the
opposition could simultaneously help you select the
least conservative candidate as well as the one
most likely to lose and that's exactly what the
Republicans did last time.
The Left knows Romney will tell you whatever you
want to hear and then do whatever is politically
expedient at the time so they're going to push him
hard. You'll hear talk radio show hosts refer to
him as a "conservative" just like we heard them do
last time he ran and the name "Romney" will be used
in conjunction with the word "conservative"
endlessly by the Left.
Paul Weyrich told us personally that Romney lied
to him to get his endorsement and that he would
actively work against him if he ever ran again.
Paul isn't with us anymore so we'll say it for
him:
What's the scandal count up to now?
Speaking of Sharpton, and as much as we like
Fox, no matter what this piece of <expletive
deleted> has gotten away with lately, FNC waits
just long enough for his latest scandal to fade
from memory so they can trot him out for another
segment as if he deserved more respect than the
Bourbon Street, 3-card monte dealer he is. He may
be a race-pimping, riot-inciting, conman but he
is a good entertainer.
Have you ever seen one of those 50's and early
60's anti-communist propaganda films? They were
pretty corny by today's standards, and fun to watch
if you like that sort of thing. The emphasis was on
the Soviets which worked for the times. Today when
you watch them, you're struck with the nagging
impression that a Soviet invasion was imminent and
a commie was behind every bush - which seems
difficult to believe.
While the Soviets were certainly funding and
manipulating our own homegrown Marxists, that was
more of a marriage of convenience. We already had,
and continue to have our own Marxists and they've
been toiling away at destroying this country since
before 1900. If you listen to what they were saying
about Marxism, the long-term goals of Marxists to
transform this country, and the characteristics of
a society ruled by Marxism, they were right on the
money.
Oh, and one by one, the Lefty martyrs of the era
have been exposed as the communists they were.
You can watch Red Nightmare if you care to
here:
Part
1,
2,
3,
4 , and
5
You'd also like:
What is Communism Part 1
What Is Communism Part 2
When you watch "What is Communism", notice how
the presenter describes the propagandistic use of
organization names and goals. They're still doing
the same thing today. Whenever you see the term
"social justice" you can be sure there's a
Marxist behind it. When you take a look at the
names of Marxist organizations they always have
some altruistic sounding name to cover the fact
that they're trying to ENSLAVE YOU.
Gee, what a nice color scheme!
Do you really think that anybody who is
constantly being accused of Leftwing bias by the
Right could possibly be so stupid as to pick the
same color scheme as the Soviets or was this just a
Three Stooges poke in our eyes?
Remember the phony Indian, phony artist, and
phony professor, Ward Churchill? Mr. "Little
Eichmanns"? He's an accomplished Marxist BS artist
who specializes in a particular technique directed
at college students and in use by thousands of
Marxist "professors" just like him. He just happens
to be the one that got caught.
Here's a little insight into how he and
the Left manages to con people, particularly
college students.
If Marxists were to come right out and tell you
what they wanted, most people would tell them to
<expletive deleted> off. So they have to lie
about it. How they lie about it depends on
the audience.
When they're dealing with a captive audience of
impressionable young people who don't have
sufficiently developed BS detectors, like college
students for example, they have a special technique
that most older people can spot in heartbeat if
they actually were to bother listening to these
clowns. The mastery of this technique also
marks their rank in the pecking order of Marxist
con-artists. Churchill ranks pretty high on the
scrotum pole.
It goes like this. If you asked somebody like
Churchill or one of his fellow travelers, a simple
question like "What do you want?" and you
got a simple answer, the simple answer would be
"I want to rob you blind and enslave you for
your own good."
That wouldn't sit well with you. So instead, he
goes on for 15 frigging minutes, saying virtually
NOTHING. But, along the way he drops a number of
key words or phrases that you recognize,
interspersed among all of the Marxist crap- isms,
turdiology and fecalities.
The older, wiser person, or the young guy with
really good common sense, says to himself, "This
guy is a BS artist, he just went on for 15 minutes
and said nothing!"
The impressionable young college student, not
expecting that Mom and Dad would be paying a good
chunk of their life savings for a professional
conman to be addressing his class, thinks to
himself:
"Wow, ummm, I didn't really understand what he
just said but I did recognize a few words and
phrases and... he must just be too profound for me
to understand yet!"
When a-holes like Churchill go on for hours and
hours like Marxist professors do, and assuming you
can stay awake long enough, they slip in the
Marxist ideology here and there and that's how they
brainwash people.
In 2001, he became the Soros Kid.
George Soros’ Open Society Institute used
to have a division called the Soros Documentary
Fund. He now has Robert Redford shilling for
him. The Soros Documentary Fund has now morphed
into the Sundance Documentary Fund. See
here.
"Under the direction of Diane Weyermann, in
2001, the Soros Documentary Fund was moved to
Sundance Institute, which is committed to the
discovery and development of independent artists
and audiences. Since moving to the Institute, now
under the direction of Cara Mertes, the fund
has continued to support U.S. and international
documentary films that explore critical issues of
our time. "
"The Soros/Sundance Documentary Fund has
supported several hundred nonfiction films
to spur awareness, action, and social change."
Great. Just great.
Captain Obvious is ready for duty.
Them
Us
Think it's time we expanded
our radio and TV a little?